Winfield is 5'8" as is Darrell Green, however I wouldn't take Moore in the 1st either, but there are plenty of good CBs who are less than 5'10", that's all I was stating. If you turn it around to WRs, Matt Jones was taken ahead of Steve Smith, but would you rather have. I take player based on how they play 1st, then scheme fit, measurables, and versatility. Obviously if you have 2 players with equal talent, but one is bigger, you will opt for bigger, just as faster is always better.
QUOTE (yerckson3420 @ Dec 27 2008, 4:27:49 PM)

This is going in a circle.
These are exceptions to the rule no doubt. (If you had an arguement about height in the nba, one could point out the 5'6" spudd webb) There is always exceptions to every rule.
I love the "5'9.3")!!!!
Like I said, its just MY opinion. I wouldn't take moore in the first round.
Plus, Moore is listed at 5'8" thru his school. Grossman was listed as 6' (which was a lie). Lets see how Moore measures up at the combine. (Barber, Greene and Winfield aren't 5'8" anyways)
It doesn't matter, time will tell. He could be a mystery at his position. Before they were drafted I would have had a similar arguement about Brandon Jacobs, Eddie George, Barry Sanders or Wayne Chrebet never panning out in the NFL because of thier sizes compared to the position they play!!! Shows what I know.